Quote:
Originally posted by mugsy
I agree Logan that it's been a long time since we've had a president that supported our military (which is pretty sad being that he is the Commander in Chief).... Both Bush and Clinton had/have strengths and weaknesses, and they seem to be totally different. Too bad we can't take the strengths of both and make one president because we'd probably get a good one. Personally, I wish McCain had won the Republican nomination and not Bush, because I think he would have done a better job.
dear molly, eisenhower, kennedy, johnson(a very short time) nixon, ford, carter, reagan, g.h. bush all had military service backgrounds, that stretch of presidents goes back slightly more then 50 years. most presidents have had military supportive policies. the battle planners of the last iraq war, the weapons, the weapons systems that were so good at delivering a bomb to a specific site, those didn't spring into being after january 2001, when mr bush took the oath of office, those women and men were trained/training and honing their skills during mr clintons' tenure. mr clinton should get some credit for that.