Let us not argue amounst ourselves but honor and pray for those fallen.
Printable View
Let us not argue amounst ourselves but honor and pray for those fallen.
Chill, Puck. With your assistance, the point has been made.Quote:
Originally Posted by Puckstop31
thank you!Quote:
Originally Posted by lizbud
This is the reason we "lost" 'my' war. Somalia.Quote:
Originally Posted by lizbud
The mission CANNOT be about ONE man. Somalia was. Get him and it takes away some of your ability to do other things that may need done. DON'T get him and the mission is a failure, no matter what else you accomplish.
Nope, the mission should never be about ONE man.
Unwinnable. And so said Constantinople.Quote:
Originally Posted by Grace
Unwinnable ?? We were winning when I was there.
Unwinnable !!! The new word for a new millenium.
Nope, sorry Gretchen, I somehow just can't get a grip on that word. Sounds too much like a word invented by someone who wants to cover their own butt because of bad decisions.
The Taliban and the Mujahideen were not freedom fighters in any sense of those words, nor were the Viet Cong, they were simply extremists who wished to exert their ideals, will and control over the more peaceful majority.
"Freedom Fighters" are words invented by the media and Jane Fonda.....period.
And when will you be joining the Aussie forces ?I'd go tomorrow if they relaxed the age requirement. No problem at all.
They (the Aussies) are still involved ?
Of course. We always have been. ;)
You see Gretchen, we Aussies believe that the allied forces in this world are about the best peacekeepers there are. We also believe that the best way to keep peace is to have a presence in those countries that threaten world peace, even when our soldiers die, we believe that they have died for world peace.
Sure, we could pull our troops out of there tomorrow, and not get involved in any war ever. I wonder how long it would be before we had to defend ourselves on our own soil ??? Well, I'd have to say "Not very long".
But....perhaps it's time, as you say, to retire and not play peacekeeper any more....so who would you suggest take over that role ??? Russia ?? China ??
Iran ?? Somalia ??
Think about that Gretchen. And tell me, who should take over that role instead of our allied forces ??
We were unable to capture & punish the ones who commited the 9/11
bombings, they died too. So Bush vowed to find & punish the man who sent
the bombers on their mission.It took years & another President to accomplish
the mission, but we did it, as promised. The end, come home.
Two then.Quote:
Originally Posted by Puckstop31
I think two is good. :p
The end.Quote:
Originally Posted by lizbud
Nice.
You make that sound as if it's right out of a book.
I was intrigued by this statement. I wonder if you could clarify - did you mean that focusing on destroying one man takes the proverbial eye off the ball, with regards to the real problems in the country? Or perhaps that, once you have the man, you create more problems in getting the population on your side? Just curious.Quote:
Originally Posted by Puckstop31
I agree with Puck that war cannot be about knocking one guy off his perch. I believe Osama was justification for sending troops out to Afghanistan. 'We want to risk soldiers' lives to sort out a country whose regime is displeasing to us' probably wouldn't have sat very comfortably with most UN countries, I should imagine.
Osama Bin Laden was the face of terrorism, and whilst it's great he can no longer bring any more of his hate to the world, there's plenty of other nutjobs like him bringing fear to the people of the Middle East through acts of terrorism. I suppose that is the 'unwinnable' part; the fact that it's one nutjob after another. I personally wouldn't like to say.
I for one am glad that we haven't abandoned the innocent once we got what we 'came' for. That being said, the loss of more and more lives of our soldiers is heartbreaking. Again, I have faith that someone's got to know when the cons outweigh the pros, and that they will have the means to take action.
Thanks for clarifying, Liz. How sad, too, that they were on their way to help others. :(Quote:
Originally Posted by lizbud
I have a friend who likes to say, no matter what a person thinks about the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, they can still support the troops by keeping them in thoughts and prayers, helping pack care packages, sending e-mails and e-cards, donating telephone cards, flying the flag, making visits to V.A. hospitals, or a whole host of other things. On that point I think he's definitely right.Quote:
Originally Posted by Puckstop31
I heard on the news last night that the removal of some 30,000 U.S. troops would include only "surge troops", not special forces like Navy SEALS. Almost 70,000 would remain there. Is the war there accomplishing what it's supposed to? Grace's "In Memoriam" thread reflects that people are getting killed there on almost a daily basis. The Middle East has never been stable- will it be that much more unstable if all the forces from all the nations leave?
They dont follow your God so they are God forsaken?Quote:
Originally Posted by Grace
This. Fight To Win! Screw the Hearts and Mind feel good garbage.Quote:
Originally Posted by wombat2u2004
We should have let my late boss, a 2 tour volunteer for Viet Nam, run the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. We probably would have had it wrapped up in 2 or 3 years. He would have made fighting us so miserable and unbearable that unequivocal surrender would be preferable to continued hostilities. We could have made it so hostile that the muslims hiding Osama would have given him up in a second, and not after 10 years.Quote:
Originally Posted by lizbud
If we had actually fought a War more of our men and women in uniform would still be with us.
If we as a Country become serious in bringing the Fight to the Enemy, and if I could get a medical waver, I'll leave before the ink is dry on the paper. We need to make War more horrendous for them then it is for us. If we arent willing to do that we should just give up and continue the collapse of our country that Hope and Change is accelerating.Quote:
Originally Posted by Grace
And Wom if Aussieland lets you back in get me a spot if they decide to actually Bring It to the Enemy.
Well said blue. All of it....well said. ;)
I'll try.... I am going to use Somalia as an example.Quote:
Originally Posted by Miss Z
Adid was not THE problem, but he was the face of it. Grab him and the problem does not go away as some other wanna be despot takes his place. But for (IMO) political expediency 'getting Adid' was how we were going to define success.
See how making the mission about ONE person can tie the hands of the people asked to accomplish the task? Yes, Osama is gone, but the problems are still there. I think the next question is are we willing to do what is necessary to try and create the conditions necessary to allow the people of Afghanistan to govern themselves in a way that will allow them to be a peaceful contributor to the world? Personally, I do not think so. If that is the case, its time to leave.
Why would you think like that Puck ??? Why do you believe that we can't leave them in a position to govern themselves peacefully ???Quote:
Originally Posted by Puckstop31
We did it in Korea. Yes ??? South Korea is on it's feet, economically stable.
Simply put, what we did there was buy those people time, to arm them and train them and get their economy right, instead of leaving them to fend for themselves against all the so called "freedom fighters" the "liberators" the blah blah blah that the media wants us to believe. Ask any South Korean if they would want ever to be part of the regime in the north, ask them if life would be better being ruled by the north, ask them if their country would be better off economically if ruled by the north......I'm pretty sure you know what their answers would be.
Allow me to fill you in a little about the war I was involved in, and the disgusting way in which it was run by the U.S.
I, like you, was a combatant. And I seen my fair share. I've been with US soldiers, Kiwi's, Aussies, South Vietnamese Army, Nung and Montagnard mercenaries, the latter three of which were fighting not for the US or anyone else....they were simply fighting for their country. We went there to help these people, and we did, and we did it well. We armed them, we trained them, and we fought with them. Against who ??? The so called "Liberators".
What a joke !!!! Liberators of what ????
The "Liberators" slaughtered at will.....oh they had a go at us alright, we all lost some 50,000 men. Any idea of how many of their own people they killed ??? Let me tell you mate, if not 100's of thousands, then it would have to be almost millions. And I'm not talking about them killing South Vietnamese soldiers (of which their was many), I'm talking about women, children, the elderly, whoever they wanted to kill. Did you know during the 1968 Tet Offensive when they over-ran Hue, they killed thousands and thousands of people because they were educated ? Yep, their only crime was to be educated. Not to mention the thousands of babies and children that were murdered after the final victory over the south because those kids were half caste....yep, Vietnamese mothers, U.S. fathers.
And we get idiots like Jane Fonda, the media, and the local San Francisco flower power people telling us to make love and not war ??? Jeez, give me a break.
Why couldn't we have done in South Vietnam like we did in Korea ???
Why is it so difficult to believe that it can happen in Afghanistan ??
Why don't we simply just DO IT ????
No rules. No bloody politician imput. Sack idiots in Congress. Just get in there and kick the hell out of them.
You know Puck, we do have the ability, I know, I've been involved in it. So no one EVER can convince me of the relevance of "UNWINNABLE", that word is just junk. We as soldiers know that, and you should know that.
Sorry for the rave, I get upset a bit.
Thanks, Puck. Seems we are indeed on the same page - your thoughts echo what I was trying to get across about Iraq and Afghanistan in my previous post.Quote:
Originally Posted by Puckstop31