I think a misquote of the bible should be pointed out, Medusa is not the kind of person to pick on anyone.
Printable View
I think a misquote of the bible should be pointed out, Medusa is not the kind of person to pick on anyone.
http://s31.photobucket.com/albums/c3...3/DCP_3630.jpg
Let me know what you think. Ya think I'll get the message across?
Isn't that baby beautiful?
Here's the other one:
http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c3...g?t=1219337842
This is not about shortcomings, yours or anyone else's. This is commentary on your blatant tampering w/Bible scripture. However, your sarcasm is duly noted. It is you who drew attention to yourself, not I. I made no insult and did not indulge in name calling. I did not say that you are dishonest but your "misquote" of scripture. Misrepresenting scripture in order to further an agenda only lends to the argument that animal rescuers/lovers, etc. will stoop to any level to further their cause, thereby tagging us as kooks. Your love of animals is not in question; it's your method of deliberately misquoting the Bible without a caveat such as "I feel animal abusers should be included in this passage" with which I take issue. The very fact that you're so defensive speaks volumes.
Well done Donna!
Well said Mary!!!
I don't see why the Bible should be so exonerated, seeing how it is so full of animal abuse and child abuse.
Donna, those posters speak volumes. They
'll definitely get the point across to everyone about this piece of pond scum (no, he's lower than that). It's funny though, that given his rap sheet that he's not in jail now. Any one of those charges should have given him jail time. As someone here said, "hand him over to the PTers!"
Great poster, I was thinking something like "make Jay Pay!"
As I had said in a previous post - "an eye for an eye" is what this monster deserves. And in this case it's unfortunate that we are too civilized to impose that sentence.