Man might go to jail for saving dog
I know I post a lot of these, but once again emails are needed.
A man saved a dog from dying from heat in a car, and is now being prosecuted for theft and conspiracy charges. It's ironic, cause I remember when I posted a long time ago about the woman who left her children in her car that I said I'd simply just break the window if I ever saw something like that, and Karen told me I could get in trouble if I did but I never really belived her, but now I see that it's true for real. How sad :(
The article about this along with contact info can be found at the following URL:
http://peta.org/alert/automation/AlertItem.asp?id=544
here is my email that i sent
The Honorable Steven Zappala,
I have just read a statement that a man might be prosecuted for saving a dog from a heated car. It makes me wonder what kind of world we are living in when a human is supposed to stand by and watch a dog perish for fear of prosecution. The man is a hero, he saved a life worthy of being saved. I ask what if this were a child? Would the situation be any different? If anyone should be prosecuted it should be the irresponsible pet owner who left their dog out to perish. Have you any idea the pain involved with a death of this nature? Please do not make American citizens fear doing the right thing. That man should be honored, not punished. Thank you for your time.
Sincerly,
A concerned citizen
Hmmm... You ought to read the WHOLE Story...
On the surface - Jeff Kearns seems to be the injured party - "Rescue" poor Vixen and he gets prosecuted...
But PETA didn't print ALL the details of this case ~
There is more to the story than PETA put on their web site (reference: PETA's "Pittsburgh Hero..." story
This line in the PETA story caught my attention:
"... When asked why he didn’t immediately volunteer to return the dog to the owner, Kearns acknowledges that he should have..."
PETA's story left out some details contained in the First of the TWO stories posted on the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review:
First Tribune-Review story, dated August 16, 2002:
"Hot car prompts dog 'rescue'
Second Tribune-Review story, dated August 25, 2002:
"Dog rescuer now facing charges"
According to the second article; the only way Vixen was returned to the owner was that the 'rescuer' (Kearns)"...was turned in to police by a friend who collected the $1,000 reward the city had posted for the dog's return." :eek: Nice 'friends' he has!
The dog 'rescue' was a possibly nobel act;
Deciding to not return the dog is probably being considered a criminal act.
I'm not taking 'sides' on this one...
There are two versions of whether Vixen was behind sealed or cracked windows; and if there was / was not water in the car available for the dog.
Be interesting to see how this case winds up... :confused: