Am I The Only One Who Thinks This Is Wrong??
My neighbor just got the sweetest dog ever and it's a pitbull. She is so sweet and nice and probably the nicest dog ever. Her name is Sandy. Well, someone wanted them to get rid of their dog because of the breed!! :eek:
Ok, I could understand if Sandy attacked someone, but she never did. I am so tired of this. Does anyone else think think this is wrong! Everybody judges dogs by their breeds! People think pitbulls, rottweilers, ect. are horrible dogs because in the past they acttacked someone. Well, they really aren't. It all depends on the training and the owner! A pitbull could be the nicest dog in the world and a golden retriever could attack someone! I just wanted to know if anyone agrees with me.
Denver has outlawed Pits w/BSL
and it could be coming to a town near you. They may legally walk into your home and take your family member and euth it.
And folks, it isn't only pits, GSDs, Rotties, Dobies...
We got very vocal with the Denver issue, but the Mayor put it in place anyway.
Folks have to move or lose their dogs. I told the Mayor, I am telling EVERYONE who loves animals to say OUT of Denver, whether to live or to recreate.
It is a frightening thing. Right here in Beaufort County, at our county shelter, you won't see a pit bull up for adoption. Ever. And yet they get them in all the time.
BSL could also translate to Australian Shepherds, all guard breeds, it really has to be stopped, the momentum is building.
A letter from today's Chicago Tribune
More on the pit bull discussion from today's (8/20) letters to the editor:
Don't trust pit bulls
I feel that I must draw attention to an issue that was brought out in two separate articles in the Aug. 14 Tribune.
First, in the news section's "Some animal shelters debate 'no kill' plans," the story quotes "Charlene Jones, founder and director of Animals at Heart, a non-profit in Jacksonville that works to help people keep their pets longer," as saying that some shelters "will adopt out potentially dangerous animals just to make space."
With that in mind, I read the Metro section article "Dogfight suspect stripped of animals; Judge rules against South Holland man; 20 of 37 seized canines called adoptable."
These dogs are now in area shelters, and according to Catherine Hedges, who is connected with the shelters, "They're a very highly rehabilitated breed because they're very loyal and eager to please. And that's their downfall. That's why people fight them."
I respectfully disagree with Hedges.
My son Nick was mauled by three pit bulls in November 2005 and still suffers loss of function and disfigurement from the attack.
These were family dogs that "snapped," and the violent rampage that resulted nearly cost my son his life.
My message is simple: In going to a shelter to adopt a dog, unless you know exactly where the dog came from, you don't know how it has been bred. If you are interested in a pit bull, the one you get from a shelter may have been bred to be extremely aggressive and violent. This violence can display itself at any time, with seemingly no provocation.
As someone who has seen the devastation from this sort of attack, it is not worth the risk.
All of those dogs that were seized have been selectively bred to be very aggressive and violent. All of them should be destroyed.
If you want a pit bull, you should go to an authorized breeder who can prove that the lineage of the dog does not contain aggressiveness. If you don't know a pit bull's ancestry, then you simply don't know if it will attack or not.
Polly Foley
Cary