Log in

View Full Version : Welcome to America! Where we tell you what religion you can or cannot practice.



ramanth
05-26-2005, 03:42 PM
I fear for our future. :eek: :mad: Land of the Free, my @$$.

And here I just finished a book about the Salem Witchhunts and thought to myself...wow, I'm so happy I live in a society where I can practice my beliefs.

Yeah.

Judge: Parents can't teach pagan beliefs (http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050526/NEWS01/505260481)


Judge: Parents can't teach pagan beliefs
Father appeals order in divorce decree that prevents couple from exposing son to Wicca.

By Kevin Corcoran
[email protected]

An Indianapolis father is appealing a Marion County judge's unusual order that prohibits him and his ex-wife from exposing their child to "non-mainstream religious beliefs and rituals."

The parents practice Wicca, a contemporary pagan religion that emphasizes a balance in nature and reverence for the earth.

Cale J. Bradford, chief judge of the Marion Superior Court, kept the unusual provision in the couple's divorce decree last year over their fierce objections, court records show. The order does not define a mainstream religion.

Bradford refused to remove the provision after the 9-year-old boy's outraged parents, Thomas E. Jones Jr. and his ex-wife, Tammie U. Bristol, protested last fall.

Through a court spokeswoman, Bradford said Wednesday he could not discuss the pending legal dispute.

The parents' Wiccan beliefs came to Bradford's attention in a confidential report prepared by the Domestic Relations Counseling Bureau, which provides recommendations to the court on child custody and visitation rights. Jones' son attends a local Catholic school.

"There is a discrepancy between Ms. Jones and Mr. Jones' lifestyle and the belief system adhered to by the parochial school. . . . Ms. Jones and Mr. Jones display little insight into the confusion these divergent belief systems will have upon (the boy) as he ages," the bureau said in its report.

But Jones, 37, Indianapolis, disputes the bureau's findings, saying he attended Bishop Chatard High School in Indianapolis as a non-Christian.

Jones has brought the case before the Indiana Court of Appeals, with help from the Indiana Civil Liberties Union. They filed their request for the appeals court to strike the one-paragraph clause in January.

"This was done without either of us requesting it and at the judge's whim," said Jones, who has organized Pagan Pride Day events in Indianapolis. "It is upsetting to our son that he cannot celebrate holidays with us, including Yule, which is winter solstice, and Ostara, which is the spring equinox."

The ICLU and Jones assert the judge's order tramples on the parents' constitutional right to expose their son to a religion of their choice. Both say the court failed to explain how exposing the boy to Wicca's beliefs and practices would harm him.

Bristol is not involved in the appeal and could not be reached for comment. She and Jones have joint custody, and the boy lives with the father on the Northside.

Jones and the ICLU also argue the order is so vague that it could lead to Jones being found in contempt and losing custody of his son.

"When they read the order to me, I said, 'You've got to be kidding,' " said Alisa G. Cohen, an Indianapolis attorney representing Jones. "Didn't the judge get the memo that it's not up to him what constitutes a valid religion?"

Some people have preconceived notions about Wicca, which has some rituals involving nudity but mostly would be inoffensive to children, said Philip Goff, director of the Center for the Study of Religion & American Culture at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.

"Wiccans use the language of witchcraft, but it has a different meaning to them," Goff said. "Their practices tend to be rather pacifistic. They tend to revolve around the old pagan holidays. There's not really a church of Wicca. Practices vary from region to region."

Even the U.S. military accommodates Wiccans and educates chaplains about their beliefs, said Lawrence W. Snyder, an associate professor of religious studies at Western Kentucky University.

"The federal government has given Wiccans protection under the First Amendment," Snyder said. "Unless this judge has some very specific information about activities involving the child that are harmful, the law is not on his side."

At times, divorcing parents might battle in the courts over the religion of their children. But Kenneth J. Falk, the ICLU's legal director, said he knows of no such order issued before by an Indiana court. He said his research also did not turn up such a case nationally.

"Religion comes up most frequently when there are disputes between the parents. There are lots of cases where a mom and dad are of different faiths, and they're having a tug of war over the kids," Falk said. "This is different: Their dispute is with the judge. When the government is attempting to tell people they're not allowed to engage in non-mainstream activities, that raises concerns."

Indiana law generally allows parents who are awarded physical custody of children to determine their religious training; courts step in only when the children's physical or emotional health would be endangered.

Getting the judge's religious restriction lifted should be a slam-dunk, said David Orentlicher, an Indiana University law professor and Democratic state representative from Indianapolis.

"That's blatantly unconstitutional," Orentlicher said. "Obviously, the judge can order them not to expose the child to drugs or other inappropriate conduct, but it sounds like this order was confusing or could be misconstrued."

The couple married in February 1995, and their divorce was final in February 2004.

As Wiccans, the boy's parents believe in nature-based deities and engage in worship rituals that include guided meditation that Jones says improved his son's concentration. Wicca "is an understanding that we're all connected, and respecting that," said Jones, who is a computer Web designer.

Jones said he does not consider himself a witch or practice anything resembling witchcraft.

During the divorce, he told a court official that Wiccans are not devil worshippers. And he said he does not practice a form of Wicca that involves nudity.

"I celebrate life as a duality. There's a male and female force to everything," Jones said. "I feel the Earth is a living creature. I don't believe in Satan or any creature of infinite evil."

Suki Wingy
05-26-2005, 04:37 PM
I know. Why doesn money say "in god we trust"? Because when they stopped keeping the same ammout worth of silver to paper money and coinage people were worried so they put "in god.." also, got wasn't in the pledge of alleigence untill the 50s. I have a pre-god dollar!

catnapper
05-26-2005, 04:44 PM
What the heck? I helped hubby do a lesson plan on the witch hunts last year, and I too was enlightened to how far our country has come in dealing with differences... this is just plain wrong!

K9soul
05-26-2005, 05:22 PM
I feel as time goes on, America is becoming less and less a "free nation." It is very sad :(

Lady's Human
05-26-2005, 05:38 PM
"In God we Trust " has been on US Coinage since the civil war. It didn't appear on paper money until 1956, however that has nothing to do with the currency being fixed to a metal standard. The US went away from the gold standard in 1971, well after the motto appeared on paper currency. The motto's appearance on paper currency was simply an extension of an 1834 federal law requiring the phrase on US coinage.

The ruling is disturbing on many levels, but is likely to be thrown out about 30 seconds after getting to a real court.

lizbud
05-26-2005, 05:52 PM
Originally posted by Lady's Human


The ruling is disturbing on many levels, but is likely to be thrown out about 30 seconds after getting to a real court.


The Republican judge who made this ruling is the presiding
judge of all 32 county superior courts.I agree, it will be reversed
in another descision. Even the U S Army recoginizes Wicca as
a valid choice for religious observation.

Kfamr
05-26-2005, 05:55 PM
Originally posted by K9soul
I feel as time goes on, America is becoming less and less a "free nation." It is very sad :(

-sigh- Same here.

It's so "land of the free" when we're banning certain beloved pets and not allowing people to marry who they wish.

Lady's Human
05-26-2005, 06:04 PM
By the Marion county Website, he is the presiding judge of the executive council of the Marion county superior court, not in charge of all 32 counties, just the one.


and what, praytell, does his affiliation as a republican have to do with the price of tea in China? There are intolerant idiots in all political parties.

lizbud
05-26-2005, 06:25 PM
Originally posted by Lady's Human
By the Marion county Website, he is the presiding judge of the executive council of the Marion county superior court, not in charge of all 32 counties, just the one.


and what, praytell, does his affiliation as a republican have to do with the price of tea in China? There are intolerant idiots in all political parties.

I found it very ironic that an Indiana judge (Republican), is doing
exactly what the President accuses independant federal judges
of doing. Expressing personal opinion, not LAW, in basing their rulings.

This judge is both executive of the council (which he organized)
and also chief judge of all the other county judges in superior
courts.

http://indianalawblog.com/archives/2005/01/indiana_courts_101.html

Lady's Human
05-26-2005, 06:50 PM
I think that you'll find that in family courts the judges opinions and not the laws rule in many instances. Just ask people who are paying child support how the judge decided. In some cases it's by the book, but there are many that I know of where the judge said "because that's what I think you should pay". Just ask a father who is trying to gain custody of his children how much the law comes into play in family court. There have been many cases in Worcester County MA where a particular judge has given custody of the children to the mother because she believed mothers raised children, not fathers. Had nothing to do with either parent's fitness as a parent, just the judge's belief.

Again, I fail to see what the judge's political affilitation has to do with anything. Zell Miller is a democrat who is more conservative than many republicans, and the current Governor of CA (Arnie ) is more liberal than many democrats. that's just two on the national scene, and there are probably hundreds of elected officials whose beliefs in no way shape or form follow their theoretical party affiliation.

lady_zana
05-27-2005, 07:33 AM
Originally posted by lizbud
Even the U S Army recoginizes Wicca as
a valid choice for religious observation.

I know many Wiccans and like in all religions, some of them are great people and some of them are not-so-great. We live in a place that says we have 'freedom of religion' so it shouldn't matter if our religion is mainstream or recongized by organizations like the military. If I worshipped rocks (which I don't ;) ), as long as I was not infringing on the rights of anyone else, why shouldn't I teach my child to worship rocks as well?

ramanth
05-27-2005, 08:14 AM
I'm starting the Church of Pets, where you can worship your pets, free of persecution. :D

moosmom
05-27-2005, 08:17 AM
Kimmy,

Sign me up!!!

K9soul
05-27-2005, 08:31 PM
Originally posted by ramanth
I'm starting the Church of Pets, where you can worship your pets, free of persecution. :D

Might as well make it official since I already worship them at home ;) :D

dukedogsmom
05-27-2005, 08:33 PM
I like that one!

Suki Wingy
05-27-2005, 09:18 PM
My religion is the ways of nature and the forses of nature and animals already. It is my own religion.

smokey the elder
05-28-2005, 07:21 AM
Judicial activism at its worst! There is WAY too much of that. A judge's job is to INTERPRET the law. It is not for them to make laws.

I don't want to pick on any particular group, but I'm afraid we're entering a very critical time for the spiritual health of the US and the world. In a lot of ways I think we're going backwards. Heinlein, in his Future History stories, tells of a fundamentalist totalitarian government which is uncomfortabley resonant with what our system seems to be evolving (devolving?) toward. Symptoms of this are illiteracy (general and especially scientific), rabid fanaticism, and other alarming social behaviors.

Just when you thought it was safe to come out of the broom closet...

dukedogsmom
05-28-2005, 09:27 AM
Originally posted by ramanth
I'm starting the Church of Pets, where you can worship your pets, free of persecution. :D
Here ya go:
http://www.boomspeed.com/dukedogsmom/churchofpets.jpg
Taken from here: http://www.churchsigngenerator.com/index_1.php

lizbud
05-28-2005, 12:38 PM
Originally posted by smokey the elder


I don't want to pick on any particular group, but I'm afraid we're entering a very critical time for the spiritual health of the US and the world. In a lot of ways I think we're going backwards. Heinlein, in his Future History stories, tells of a fundamentalist totalitarian government which is uncomfortabley resonant with what our system seems to be evolving (devolving?) toward. Symptoms of this are illiteracy (general and especially scientific), rabid fanaticism, and other alarming social behaviors.

Just when you thought it was safe to come out of the broom closet...


So true, but people tend to prefer not seeing what's going on,
or at least putting it out of their mind.:(

davidpizzica
05-29-2005, 09:12 AM
Originally posted by ramanth
I'm starting the Church of Pets, where you can worship your pets, free of persecution. :D Kimmy, can I become a chief priest??

Cincy'sMom
05-30-2005, 12:16 PM
Originally posted by ramanth
I'm starting the Church of Pets, where you can worship your pets, free of persecution. :D

I believe this may be a branch of the church I started a few years back...

See, a girl I worked with is now a misionary in Chile. At the time, it was perfectly okay for her to sit at her desk and read the Bible. Others at work (myself included) were asked not to read the newspaper, novels or non-work related things at our desks. (We were all reasearch chemists...somedays you would start several reactions and having nothing to do but wait!)

Anyway, I decided that from that day on, I belonged to the Church of Dog, and bought this book to keep on my desk...
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/1572235896.01._PE32_SCMZZZZZZZ_.jpg

Dog Fancy, became my monthly church newsletter. I was just waiting for someone to say something to me for reading a magazine...but I changed jobs shortly thereafter!!

Suki Wingy
05-30-2005, 10:19 PM
haha, smart!

ramanth
05-31-2005, 01:44 PM
:D

Val: that's great! Thanks for the link. :)

Amy: Huh wha!? So the co-worker could read a Bible but nothing else was allowed!? *headdesk*

I loved your shortcut though!


Seriously though... it's so scary to think such things could be put into effect. A fellow law librarian said he feels the ruling wouldn't hold up in an appeals court.

Still...what's to keep another Judge from doing the same? Or other religions being scrutinized?

I feel as if we're regressing and not learning from our own history. :(

ILoveReptiles
05-31-2005, 03:51 PM
So much for land of the free indeed.

Chipping away... slowly but surely.

Luvin Labs
05-31-2005, 05:59 PM
Originally posted by ramanth
I feel as if we're regressing and not learning from our own history. :(

Yup, back to the Crusades and the Salem Witch Trials...

**banghead**

:(

lizbud
05-31-2005, 08:39 PM
I ran across an update of sorts and more background on this
judge's decision & other commentary about it as well. Very
interesting...

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/5/27/8412/78054

ramanth
06-01-2005, 10:09 AM
Thanks for the update Liz!

lizbud
08-17-2005, 07:36 PM
Hey ramanth, the case decision was overturned. Guess the
American system works right most of the time.:)


Court Overturns Judge's Order In Wicca Case
Divorce Decree Had Instructed Parents To Shield Son From Beliefs

POSTED: 4:33 pm EST August 17, 2005

INDIANAPOLIS -- A judge exceeded his authority by ordering an Indianapolis Wiccan activist and his ex-wife to shield their 9-year-old son from what his decree called their "non-mainstream religious beliefs and rituals," the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled Wednesday.

The appeals court threw out the order from Marion Superior Court Judge Cale Bradford, citing a state law that gives a custodial parent the authority to determine a child's upbringing -- including religious training -- unless certain exceptions are met.

Divorcing parents can agree to allow such orders, or judges can find that certain limitations on upbringing are needed to protect the child from physical and emotional harm.

The Indiana Civil Liberties Union, representing Thomas E. Jones and Tammy Bristol of Indianapolis, had challenged the religious provision of the divorce decree.

Jones, a Wiccan activist who has coordinated Pagan Pride Day in Indianapolis for at least six years, said earlier this year that he and his ex-wife were stunned when they saw the language in the judge's dissolution decree on Feb. 13, 2004.

"We both had an instant resolve to challenge it. We could not accept it," Jones said when the appeal was filed this year.

A court commissioner wrote the unusual order into the couple's dissolution decree after a routine report by the court's Domestic Relations Counseling Bureau noted that both Jones and his ex-wife are pagans who send their son, Archer, now 10, to a Catholic elementary school.

The decree said "the parents are directed to take such steps as are needed to shelter (the child) from involvement and observation of these non-mainstream religious beliefs and rituals." The splitting parents challenged that section of the decree, but Bradford let it stand.

The order was criticized by various religious and advocacy groups.

Wiccans consider themselves witches, pagans or neo-pagans, and say their religion is based on respect for the earth, nature and the cycle of the seasons.

Wiccans contend their religion is becoming more mainstream. The parents' appeal said there were about 1 million pagans worldwide in 2002, more than the numbers who practice Sikhism, Taoism and other established religions in the United States.

Among other things, the appeal claimed the decree was unconstitutionally vague because it did not define mainstream religion. But the appeals court based its ruling on state law.

ICLU attorney Ken Falk said nobody fought the parent's challenge, so an appeal was very unlikely.

"I think the bottom line is the court said a parent has the right to determine the upbringing of their child absent some compelling or strong reason," Falk said. "I have to tell you in reading all the cases, I've never found a case where both parents agreed yet a court directed some other type of religious upbringing."

mugsy
08-17-2005, 11:03 PM
Leave it to conservative IN to make a judgement like that, but, like LH said....when it gets to a "real" court they will throw it out....we do still have freedom of religion here regardless of what some idiot judge in family court says.

As far as "In God We Trust" being on coins and money....what I tell the athesists that have a problem with it...don't use it....:rolleyes: ;)

And this coming from a woman with a Darwin fish on her car!!

PS....I am a Christian too, but, believe that everyone has the right to worship in what ever way they choose.

OOPS....I POSTED AS LIZ WAS POSTING....

SEE!! I told you that they would overturn it!! :D

RICHARD
08-18-2005, 12:32 AM
Practice?

Kids playing t ball practice,
Kids in a school play practice.
Sport teams practice.

Why??

To get it RIGHT!!!


I don't want a lawyer who "practices"
I don't want a doctor who "practices"
I dont't want anyone, who has a voice in how my life is run
"practicing"



Therefore......

If your faith is rock steady..nothing can shake you from it.


Faith is something that you carry inside you and nothing can take that away from you....So when someone makes a stupid law or passes a judgement, you rely on you strength and faith to move on, to overcome that barrier....


No practicing faith........It;s the real thing.:eek:

grybai
08-18-2005, 01:00 AM
Ick. I'm happy that the rulling with overturned but the whole ordeal saddens me in general. I'm sick of all these imposed limitations regarding religion, race, sexuality, and gender. :mad: Sigh...

DJFyrewolf36
08-18-2005, 01:14 PM
The subject of relgious freedom really hits a nerve with me...

I lived in southern Virginia for a year. (Before I go on, I'm not intending to bash anyone here, my opinions are based on my observations and experences with the people I went to school with). I am a baptised Lutheran, although my particular interpritation of what the Bible says and what Christ taught isn't exactly congruent with some of the opinions of some established Christian denominations. I ran afoul of some very fanatical Baptists (again, not insulting Baptists as a whole, just the particular group I interacted with) who seemed to think that anyone who wasn't a Baptist (and you had to be a particular type of Baptist as well) was going to burn in the pits of the darkest hells for all eternity. And it wasn't just about following thier interpretation of the bible either. You had to be baptised and a confirmed member of THAT church in order to be saved. Accepting Christ apperantly wasn't enough. I was physically attacked on more than one occasion, I had obcene things painted on my dorm door and had these people approach me with thier "message" at all hours of the day and night. Keep in mind I am a Christian, and I am not shy about stating that fact. It didn't seem to matter to these people. Its one thing to prosicute "non mainstream" religions, although it is wrong to do so. Its another when the "majority" is fighting against itself.

Land of the free...unfortuneatly that means people are free to spout off any opinion they wish. I am glad that the ruling was overturned though. It is a small step in the right direction.

ramanth
08-18-2005, 03:09 PM
Woo!! Thanks for the update Liz. :D

DJFyrewolf36: I'm sorry you had to go thru something like that. I had similar experiences but never anything so physical or cruel.

*hugs*

DJFyrewolf36
08-18-2005, 03:48 PM
I learned from it, ramanth, and to be honest I'm glad for the experence. It taught me some good life lessons. Even the worst situations can be learned from