Log in

View Full Version : EEEK! "New U.S. airport scanner sees through clothes"



Catty1
10-14-2007, 11:37 PM
So much for a Dress Code! :eek:

http://cfcn.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/scfcn/CTVNews/20071014/airport_scanner_071014

New U.S. airport scanner sees through clothes

CTV.ca News Staff

Sun. October. 14 2007 10:12 PM ET

A new full-body scanner being tested by the U.S. government as a replacement for airport metal detectors can see through the clothing of passengers.

For the U.S. Transportation Security Administration (TSA), it's the latest step to wipe out terrorism.

The "millimeter wave scanner" is meant as a secondary screening of passengers pulled out of the security line, and can be requested instead of the traditional pat-down.

The machine uses radio waves to detect foreign objects and scans the entire body at high speed.

Because it produces such a detailed image, technology and privacy experts at the American Civil Liberties Union feel use of the machine is a violation of people's privacy.

"It's a virtual strip search," said Melissa Ngo, a director at the Electronic Privacy Information Center. "(It's) a detailed image of a person's body. So detailed that you can see genitalia."

The device is programmed to blur the passenger's face so that screeners -- all in a separate room -- won't know who they're seeing naked. The system is not set up to record anything.

Security officers at the Sky Harbor International Airport in Phoenix, Ariz. have been testing similar devices since February.

However, the new scanners don't deal with the 7,500 tonnes of cargo put on passenger planes every day.

A government audit in July found monitoring of air cargo at the airport "ineffective".

"It's a glaring vulnerability when there are virtually no inspections whatsoever," said Clark Kent Ervin, former U.S. inspector of general and homeland security.

TSA purchased eight of the new scanners, which cost between $100,000 and $120,000, and is considering deploying them at John F. Kennedy and Los Angeles airports during the test period.

A spokesperson for TSA said the results of the testing will determine whether to use these machines for primary screening.

With reports from CTV's Tom Walters and The Associated Press

RICHARD
10-15-2007, 12:53 AM
This has been an issue for a while.

It doesn't see cellulite, varicose veins, stretch marks or tattoos.....

Proceed as ordered.
-----------

LOL, the ACLU members must have small body parts.

I have no problem with that! :rolleyes:

catnapper
10-15-2007, 07:48 AM
Yeah, I saw a documentary on it a while back. I don't go to the airport much, but based on what can happen there, I'll leave my modesty at the door with the knowledge that everyone will be scanned along with me and we'll all be much safer for it.

Daisy and Delilah
10-15-2007, 07:48 AM
lol lol lol This might be the end to my flying days :D :D :D

Sirrahsim
10-15-2007, 08:48 AM
Yeah, I saw a documentary on it a while back. I don't go to the airport much, but based on what can happen there, I'll leave my modesty at the door with the knowledge that everyone will be scanned along with me and we'll all be much safer for it.

I agree completely

moosmom
10-15-2007, 09:16 AM
I agree with Catnapper. If it helps keep the US safter, then so be it!! I got nothing to hide.

Edwina's Secretary
10-15-2007, 10:06 AM
The person who is looking at the scan is remote from the screening area. Your face is blurred. How different is it from going to a doctor? After you have seen 10,000 naked bodies....we are all pretty much the same under our clothes.

I do not believe scanning is terrible effective, but I also don't think this is an invasion of my privacy.

RICHARD
10-15-2007, 12:46 PM
The device can tell if a traveler is a problem...
It does show people with their undies in a wad!

---------------------

This was also a prob with certain vid cameras. There was a feature that made some materials see-thru.

This also can happen with regular photography too. A friend at work had a picture of her and her daughter at a graduation on her desk.

I had to pick it up and look at it closely to make sure I was seeing what I saw! :D :eek: