Log in

View Full Version : Ditching the family dog :(



JenBKR
05-01-2006, 01:06 PM
Anyone else read this? :mad:

http://www.slate.com/id/2140674/?GT1=8190

So Long, Shadow
Sometimes it makes sense to ditch the family dog.
By Emily Bazelon
Posted Thursday, April 27, 2006, at 1:43 PM ET



Last summer, my family moved from New Haven, Conn., to Washington, D.C. That is to say, most of my family moved. My husband, my two sons, and I made the trip. We left our dog, Shadow, behind. When Paul and I cried as we said goodbye to Shadow, we were crying tears of shame. What kind of couple gives away their dog—not because he is snapping at the children or even chewing on the furniture, but simply because they feel too taxed to take care of his sweet, lovable self? I was raised with dogs. I consider myself a dog lover. Yet somehow I've also become a dog abandoner. In our family's case, though, heartless as it sounds, that has turned out to be a good thing.

Shadow is a Lab mix who came to live with us seven years ago, when he was 2 and his previous owner went into a nursing home. I volunteered to adopt him during a week in which Paul was on the other side of the country. When he got back, he reminded me that he is allergic to dogs in general and to Shadow in particular. But it was too late—Shadow was already my starter baby.

When our first son, Eli, was born, Shadow's stock remained high. I was determined not to fulfill the prediction from Lady and the Tramp—"When the baby moves in, the dog moves out!" But then our second son, Simon, arrived. One rainy morning in the park, I found myself reining in Shadow with one hand while holding on to a crying Eli with the other. Simon had been sleeping on my chest in his Bjorn pouch. The crying woke him up. He wanted to nurse. I let go of the dog so I could sit down and breast-feed. Shadow took off with a joyful yelp. I tried to go after him, which, of course, enraged Simon. Eli refused to budge and then wailed when I ran across the park without him
So, Shadow's walks grew shorter and fewer. He'd stare longingly at the door before heaving himself into a morose hump on the floor. When Eli or later, Simon, toddled over to make friends, Shadow would disdainfully, if gently, depart for another room. Maybe if the kids had been older, he would have bonded with them, but Shadow had no use for babies and preschoolers. On the weekends, Shadow's needs should have dovetailed better with Eli and Simon's. And once in a while, on an afternoon when the kids were happy to throw sticks into the local river for Shadow to fetch, we'd have a Kodak-dog moment. But we lived in a city. When the kids wanted to go to the playground instead of to the river, Shadow wasn't allowed inside the fence. Tying him up made him crazy. Leaving him at home on a beautiful day made me crazy. Shadow had become our cause for guilt, and we'd become his cause for depression.

We broke down and hired an occasional dog walker. Ed came highly recommended. It was easy to see why. He was as much dog as a human being can be. His pockets brimmed with crumbly little treats. His clothes were covered in black and white and brown hair. On the days that Shadow got to go with Ed, the spring came back into his step. But Ed wasn't cheap, so those days weren't many.

We wouldn't have had the nerve to dump Shadow if we hadn't decided to move to Washington. A bigger city meant a longer commute, exactly during the hours when we tried desperately to eke out time for dog walks. Our new neighborhood had plenty of parks, but they weren't the kind of woodsy places where dogs could run free. Then there were Paul's allergies. They were bad. Doctors promised improvement in a dog-hair-free house.

When we tested the idea of leaving behind Shadow on a few friends, they departed from their usual nonjudgmental ways and squawked: "But he's part of your family!" One said that Eli and Simon would think we were planning to give them away next. Another argued that the move would be much harder for the kids if they lost Shadow along with everything else familiar. Paul and I didn't think Eli and Simon cared much about the dog. But what if we were wrong? To steel myself, I imagined the bit of extra peace I'd have at the beginning and end of each day in a Shadowless home. The vision was intoxicating.

I was too embarrassed to ask Ed if we could leave Shadow with him. Luckily, Paul wasn't. Ed reacted with appropriate disgust. But he was willing. One night, we casually told Eli and Simon that Shadow was going to stay with Ed for a while. After they went to bed, we tiptoed around the house collecting Shadow's things—his dish, his bed, his leash, his biscuits. When Ed showed up, we said our teary goodbyes and scooted Shadow out the door. We've been cringing ever since. Eli and Simon haven't seemed traumatized, but they still talk about him as "our dog." "I miss Shadow," one of them sometimes says in a warm, snuggly moment, especially at bedtime. I say that I do, too.

Then last weekend, we took a trip to New Haven. We called Ed en route and he graciously offered to bring Shadow to the park to see us. I confessed to Paul that I wished he'd said no. The idea of confronting the consequences of our crime terrified me.

At the park, we spotted Ed and Shadow in the distance. While Paul locked the car, I ran toward them, Simon in tow and Eli behind me. When he saw us, Shadow whined, jumped, sniffed, and turned in circles, bestowing on us the markers of doggy enthusiasm. But he wasn't ecstatic or frantic. He was like an old friend who is happy to go out for coffee but not so happy that he forgets to eye the cute girl in the checkout line: After a few minutes, another dog walked into the park and Shadow bounded after it. "Shadow!" Ed called, authoritatively. Shadow turned around and trotted back to Ed far more obediently than he ever had to me. Ed snapped his leash to his collar. Both were new and stenciled with SHADOW, followed by Ed's phone number. Ed described Shadow's new diet—some super Purina chow—and we all exclaimed over the dog's coat of fur, a newly burnished black. The children, meanwhile, had long since departed for the playground.

I still think that it is morally unsavory—wrong—to ditch a pet. When we took Shadow in, we implicitly promised to take care of him for life. When we passed him off to Ed, we broke that promise. But seeing Shadow last weekend reminded me that wrong doesn't always mean harmful. Our lives are calmer, freer, and in Paul's case, healthier. In another life, we would have thinned our obligations by moving to the country rather than to a bigger city. Shadow would have been part of a more relaxed home—I can see the photo in the catalog. But in this life, I am grateful to have pared down the creatures that I take care of. My favorite image of Shadow is his tail waving in the air as he walked away with Ed that weekend. He didn't look back.

UGH this article ticked me off - but if you scroll to the bottom you can read some responses, I am not the only angry one! I think I'll respond too :mad:

LKPike
05-01-2006, 01:36 PM
uhm, well i WAS going to say its probably just a foster parent writing a creative story to wake certain types of people up.... but the woman actually posted a pic of the dog with the story so, omg...

just wait, theres always other pets once the first "problem" animal is gotten rid of. atleast this one found a very nice person to live with.

Cataholic
05-01-2006, 02:05 PM
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. She wrote the story to make herself feel better. Ditching a pet is ditching a pet. How, after seven years, someone can 'dispose' of a pet is beyond me. I cannot even get rid of my too tight jeans after 12 wearings.

That made me sad. :(

elizabethann
05-01-2006, 02:20 PM
This quote especially pi$$es me off: But it was too late—Shadow was already my starter baby.

So many couples get a dog for this purpose - to see what it's like to have a baby. And when the real baby comes along, the dog is just cast aside.

JenBKR
05-01-2006, 02:42 PM
This quote especially pi$$es me off: But it was too late—Shadow was already my starter baby.

So many couples get a dog for this purpose - to see what it's like to have a baby. And when the real baby comes along, the dog is just cast aside.


Arg I missed that when I first read it. IMO, when you adopt a pet, that is a part of your family for life. You wouldn't leave your child behind, would you?

Miss Z
05-01-2006, 03:52 PM
Ugh, some people do not know the meaning of responsibility, or love, IMO. :( :mad: I suppose the upside to the story is that Shadow found a home that actually understood him.

Our lives are calmer, freer, and in Paul's case, healthier.

These people seem to be forgetting that Shadow was part of their family aswell. He has feelings too.


My favorite image of Shadow is his tail waving in the air as he walked away with Ed that weekend. He didn't look back.

Why am I not surprised?

JenBKR
05-01-2006, 03:55 PM
I agree Miss Z, I wouldn't have looked back either :(

jenluckenbach
05-01-2006, 04:23 PM
I did not go to the link to read beyond what is posted here but why are you all so shocked? Stuff like this (and things 10 and 20 times WORSE) happen hundreds of times each day!

This person was honest. This family no longer was able to or willing to care properly for this dog. Keeping him would have been like staying in a loveless marriage. The dog was not PTS, left along the side of the road nor brought to a shelter to live (or die) in a cage. The family saw that they were no longer a dog-friendly family and left him in the care of someone who had time for him.

Our very own moosmom (sorry Donna, I hope you do not take offence at this example) has rehomed several of her kitties. She NEEDED to and she thought about their best interests as well. Doogie is having the time of his life with his new dog brother and I bet that Eli is relishing his time on his new farm.

As a person who has heard hundreds of stories about why they have to "get rid of" their pet, most are weak arguments or cliche's. But I think for this dog's sake, he wins! It is when a family trades in one old pet for a new "baby" that really infuriates me. This does not seem to be the case in this story.

JUST MY OPINION Thank you for allowing me to share it.

carole
05-01-2006, 04:29 PM
I am with you on this one Jen, however i still think it is so sad when people continue to think of pets as being disposable, it is still wrong IMO, but the main thing here is Shadow is better off where he is, if he had stayed with the family just imagine how unhappy he would be, so there really is a happy ending, it is just the principle of it all that i dis-agree with as you all do, pets should never be adopted with the thought oh well we can always get rid if we have to, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG.

lizbud
05-01-2006, 04:32 PM
Yes I did read the article. (I'll read anything about animals)
What struck me about the story is that she first got the dog to please
herself, and then desposed of the same dog later for the same reason. :(

I am glad that the dog finally found someone to properly care for him
an wanted the dog just for himself.

dab_20
05-01-2006, 04:40 PM
IMO she did the right thing... giving him to someone who actually cares about him. At least Shadow's happy now.

I DO NOT agree that she got the dog in the first place as a 'starter baby'. :rolleyes: What really made me angry is that on the top it says "Sometimes it makes sense to ditch the family dog". :mad: :( She worded the article very wrong... sounds like she never cared about the dog after her kids were born.

carole
05-01-2006, 04:42 PM
Yes I agree a lot of the way in which she worded the article really aggravated me and made me angry.

JenBKR
05-02-2006, 08:09 AM
This article upset me not because of the outcome, because I think that Shadow did actually get a better home, but because of the nonchalant way she worded it. Yes, she rehomed the dog instead of dumping him off at a shelter, but it's the way she worded it, like who cares, it's just a dog.

Cataholic
05-02-2006, 08:59 AM
I did not go to the link to read beyond what is posted here but why are you all so shocked? Stuff like this (and things 10 and 20 times WORSE) happen hundreds of times each day!

Jen, this doesn't sit well with me, and I don't think you mean it as it was worded, since I 'know' you. That bad stuff happens much worse every day doesn't change that THIS is a bad thing, and is 'deserving' of our attention, too. Sure, lots of worse things happen, but, that shouldn't detract from this situation.


This person was honest.

Honesty or dishonesty doesn't make give this woman any more character, IMO. If I say, "I hate you" and slap you across the face, my statment of hate doesn't support my action, does it? Yet, I am being 'honest'.


Our very own moosmom (sorry Donna, I hope you do not take offence at this example) has rehomed several of her kitties. She NEEDED to and she thought about their best interests as well. Doogie is having the time of his life with his new dog brother and I bet that Eli is relishing his time on his new farm.

The difference with Donna's situation was HER needs were put second. She rehomed her pets because it was best for THEM. Not her. In fact, if she could have done it differently, I think she would have preferred they stay with her. It wasn't like Donna said, "Oh, I am tired of having so many cats, some have got to go!". Of course, Donna is quite able to speak for herself, so, I will conclude with this is MY interpretation of her situation. An interpretation for which I could very well be wrong.

I think the wrongness here is the desensitizing effect the article could have on people 'ditching' pets. The more we hear, support, agree with lame reasons to ditch our pets, the more it happens. It is changing the minds of individuals, one at a time, to support inclusion, responsibility, commitment and love, that needs work here. Not articles putting a positive spin on 'ditching' family pets.

Catty1
05-02-2006, 09:17 AM
They took time to find someone to take him, didn't just leave him in the house or drive him out into the country and dump him.

Sure they felt guilty - and cried, and struggled...

This was quality of life for the dog AND THE ADULTS who were dealing with allergies and two toddlers.

Maybe if she had written more about her guilt and added more stories of crying, some folks here would feel better about it.

Human marriages are supposed to be a lifetime commitment too - HELLO?

Life happens.

I agree with what she did.

JMO

Catty1

Corinna
05-02-2006, 09:21 AM
I think Ed and Shadow are the heros and winners in this story.
First of all this woman had no right to adopt a dog with out consulting with her partner. it all went down hill from there.
I'm glad for Ed and Shadow they have each other and it's very apparent they have a great partnership.

K9soul
05-02-2006, 09:30 AM
I think the wrongness here is the desensitizing effect the article could have on people 'ditching' pets. The more we hear, support, agree with lame reasons to ditch our pets, the more it happens. It is changing the minds of individuals, one at a time, to support inclusion, responsibility, commitment and love, that needs work here. Not articles putting a positive spin on 'ditching' family pets.

This really states well why I felt upset by the article. The title, the use of the word "ditching," the way she seemed to feel justified and talked about how the dog listened to Ed better than he ever had her. Well that's called training. She seemed to have an attitude like "Oh well he's got a better home now and happier so it was fine to 'ditch' him." Which by the way she didn't even have the courage to ask Ed herself and who knows where the dog would have ended up if her husband hadn't stepped up and asked. Thank God for people like Ed, those who constantly step up to clean up the messes of people who just "don't have the time" to properly care for an animal THEY have committed to when they brought it home.

It just seemed like the point behind the article was to say "it's fine to ditch the family pet if you just don't feel like working through the problems." I agree with Johanna, the article seemed written to assuage this woman's own guilt.

I don't really see it the same as a marriage breaking up because that is two adults involved and both making decisions for themselves. A dog or cat is helpless at the hands of its humans and has no say in what happens. I see it more like dumping a little child one doesn't want to deal with.