Good article, liz.

Thought this summed it up quite well -

Quote:
“The novel standard adopted by the appellate court majority is without any foundation in Illinois law,’’ the Supreme Court’s ruling said.


Grace, I thought the ruling, which was 7-0, made it quite clear that
the lower court was out of line in removing Rahm in the first place.

Some only insist on strict Constitutionality only when they benefit from
it. Sorry, that's not they way it works folks.