I realize some of the members are dead-set against any pets because they have been burned so badly in the past. My question to all your members would be: "IF you were going to allow pets, what would your conditions be?"
Example:
1. Proof of vaccination and spay/neuter, and name of vet. (If there is a regular vet, and the pet has been a patient there for some time with regular checkups, chances are the owner is responsible.
2. Three references from former landlords/neighbours/roommates.
3. Call/email Animal Control with previous address to see about complaints.
4. Extra deposit.
5. Two-three month probation, which tenants sign and agree to. They then have 1 month to rehome the pet, or Animal Control/Humane is called in.
6. Designating a certain # of suites per building as pet-friendly.
Gerry, these are just ideas off the top of my head. They mean extra work, so a Pet Application fee should apply. On the one hand, I am concerned about the slowly dwindling number of homes for pets, which means perfectly healthy and sweet critters are put to sleep because of overcrowding - and on the other, I absolutely understand the landlord's position. It is more the owner that has to be evaluated along with the animal.
If you would be willing to put something in your next newsletter, I would be happy to write it, and get feedback from your members. I would also suggest the results might be a good educational piece to put in the local news through the Humane Society or just through your organization.
Bookmarks