Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22

Thread: Rape Victim Faces Jail

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    indianapolis,indiana usa
    Posts
    22,881

    Rape Victim Faces Jail

    I am just stunned by this judge's order.


    Alleged rape victim threatened with jail

    By Art Barnum
    Tribune staff reporter
    Published February 28, 2006, 10:21 PM CST


    A Naperville woman who on Tuesday refused a judge's order to view a videotape of her alleged rape could be jailed on a contempt of court charge if she does not change her mind Wednesday, and the judge is considering a request to drop sexual assault charges against the Burr Ridge man on trial.

    "I am ordering you to answer these questions," Judge Kerry Kennedy told the woman after an hourlong recess to discuss her refusal. "The consequences are that you would be held in contempt of court, with incarceration possible. Are you still refusing?"

    "Yes," she responded.

    "I will give you overnight to think about this," Kennedy said. "Tomorrow, I will ask you again."

    The woman was 16 years old when she allegedly was assaulted and videotaped four years ago at a party in the Burr Ridge home of Adrian Missbrenner, 20. He was one of four men charged in connection with the incident, and his trial on charges of aggravated criminal sexual assault and child pornography began Tuesday in Cook County Circuit Court in Bridgeview. He faces 6 to 30 years in prison if convicted.

    The woman answered questions from prosecution and defense attorneys for about an hour. But when Missbrenner's attorney, Patrick Campanelli, placed a video monitor in front of her and said he was going to play segments of the 20-minute videotape as he questioned her, she stated emphatically "I don't want to see it."

    After the judge warned the woman that she was expected to testify Wednesday, Campanelli quickly asked that the criminal case against Missbrenner be dismissed.

    "Your honor, my client has a constitutional right to confrontation of a witness," he said.

    Assistant State's Atty. Michael Deno argued against dismissal. "This witness has testified to every other question, and she has testified that she doesn't have any recollection or memory of the videotape incident at all," he said.

    Kennedy declined to rule on the dismissal request until after the trial resumes Wednesday.

    George Acosta, the attorney representing the woman in a civil case against Missbrenner's family, said she has never viewed the video and has stated repeatedly that she did not want to.

    The woman has said she did not know Missbrenner before going to his home with a girlfriend in the early morning hours of Dec. 7, 2002.

    In opening remarks, Deno said the woman "made two mistakes: she got drunk and placed herself in the hands of the wrong people."

    She and one of Missbrenner's friends began a drinking contest, which caused her to vomit, Deno said. "That's the last thing she remembers," he said.

    Campanelli argued that the sex was consensual.

    "One-night stands happen all the time, and in the morning you regret it," he said, adding that he thinks the witness' answers to questions while viewing the videotape would "strongly help Adrian's case."

    The woman testified that she woke up in Missbrenner's house the next morning, naked from the waist down with vulgar words written on her legs with a marker.

    She said she went home and cried, and learned later that she had been videotaped. Accompanied by several friends, she went back to the Burr Ridge home and asked for the tape, but Missbrenner denied it existed, she said.

    Her parents then took her to a hospital, and police were called.

    Several days later, Cook County police obtained the videotape from a friend of Missbrenner's, who said Missbrenner had given it to him.

    Campanelli said Missbrenner was concerned the girl was going to claim that the sex was not consensual so he gave the tape to the friend to save, if needed, to support his claim.

    The videotape was viewed in the March 2005 trial of Christopher Robbins of Brookfield, who was acquitted of sex charges after arguing she consented to sex with him in an incident that wasn't videotaped. Robbins allegedly is seen on one segment of the tape, but not engaging in sex with the woman.

    Prosecutors allege that the videotape first shows another defendant, Burim Berezi of Brookfield, having sex with the woman, then it shows Missbrenner. They say the tape shows her unconscious as people spit on her and write derogatory words on her naked legs and abdomen.

    Berezi fled the country after being charged and remains at large. Missbrenner also fled but returned from Europe in May 2005. A jury convicted him of violating his bail bond, and he was sentenced to six months in jail, which has been served while he was being held without bail on the sex charges.

    The fourth defendant, Sonny Smith, 20, of Brookfield, who operated the camera, pleaded guilty to child pornography and was sentenced to the Illinois Department of Corrections boot camp.



    [email protected]
    I've Been Boo'd

    I've been Frosted






    Today is the oldest you've ever been, and the youngest you'll ever be again.

    Eleanor Roosevelt

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Gran Canaria, Spain
    Posts
    2,291
    I can understand why she wouldn´t want the tape to be shown, it would be like being raped again. I hope this man gets the maximum sentencing.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Pixsburgh
    Posts
    5,004
    Ahh that makes me so MAD Seeing that tape could affect her mental condition and victimize her all over again.

    In opening remarks, Deno said the woman "made two mistakes: she got drunk and placed herself in the hands of the wrong people."
    And this quote makes me steam - NO ONE asks to be raped!!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Ploss's Halfway House for Homeless Cats
    Posts
    18,311
    Right on JenBKR!!!!

    Rest In Peace Casey (Bubba Dude) Your paw print will remain on my heart forever. 12/02
    Mollie Rose, you were there for me through good times and in bad, from the beginning.Your passing will leave a hole in my heart.We will be together "One Fine Day". 1994-2009
    MooShoo,you left me too soon.I wasn't ready.Know that you were my soulmate and have left me broken hearted.I loved you like no other. 1999 - 2010See you again "ONE FINE DAY"
    Maya Linn, my heart is broken. The day your beautiful blue eyes went blind was the worst day of my life.I only wish I could've done something.I'll miss your "premium" purr and our little "conversations". 1997-2013 See you again "ONE FINE DAY"

    DO NOT BUY WHILE SHELTER ANIMALS DIE!!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Gran Canaria, Spain
    Posts
    2,291
    In opening remarks, Deno said the woman "made two mistakes: she got drunk and placed herself in the hands of the wrong people.
    I think that statement is completely true. What she did was incredibly stupid, but no one deserves what happened to her. I hope that story educates young girls what can happen with binge drinking.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    874
    The statement that she made mistakes by getting drunk and putting herself in a situation where she could be raped may or may not be true - however, what is true is by saying it and saying it in such a manner, the defense was placing the blame on the girl, not the guy.

    A woman has the right to act and dress and associate with whomever she choose; she also has a right NOT to be violated in any manner. Many people say a woman 'asked to be raped' because she wearing tight or revealing clothing (I don't know if that was part of this case or not) but that's completely untrue. The victim - female OR male - never asked to be raped despite of any other details of the case.

    Yes, we all make stupid mistakes and have regrets. Those mistakes, however, are not our fault and should have no bearing on the guilt of her rapists.
    Proud meowmy of Weezie, Eepie, Grey Girl and Neko...or Weezer Peezer, Eepie Peepie, Grey Grey and Neko the Gecko as they are commonly known!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In my garden
    Posts
    1,633
    If the tape shows her unconcious and being touched sexually, how can it be anything but sexual assault at the very least? Getting drunk to the point of unconciousness does not imply consent to anything being done to you.

    If I was forced to watch such a tape, I'd make sure to vomit in the judge's lap - because that would be a natural reaction to having to relive it all.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    indianapolis,indiana usa
    Posts
    22,881
    Quote Originally Posted by Lizzie
    If the tape shows her unconcious and being touched sexually, how can it be anything but sexual assault at the very least? Getting drunk to the point of unconciousness does not imply consent to anything being done to you.

    If I was forced to watch such a tape, I'd make sure to vomit in the judge's lap - because that would be a natural reaction to having to relive it all.

    I think the judge is a sadist. What if it was his mother, sister, or
    daughter? It seems this case is drawing a lot of free legal help for her if
    she is jailed over this.
    I've Been Boo'd

    I've been Frosted






    Today is the oldest you've ever been, and the youngest you'll ever be again.

    Eleanor Roosevelt

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    5,525
    That is really stupid. REALLY STUPID of the judge. How can he be so awful as to make her relive what happened to her?!? Just awful....

    *Sammy*Springen*Molli*

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Chicago area, Illinois, USA
    Posts
    1,586
    I read this story tonight and I was stunned that the judge would threaten her with contempt of court for refusing to watch a tape of her own alledged sexual assault. I've never heard of such a thing and frankly it makes me suspicious of the judge's motives. I'm sorry, but that's the way I feel and it makes me sad. The judge's order would probably not hold up under appeal, but I suspect that the purpose is to make her drop the whole thing and so it wouldn't make any difference. Many rape victims cannot take the trauma of a court case and I suspect someone's pushing her to the max.
    Spoiled child, bad
    Spoiled cat, good

  11. #11
    Just read a Fox news story, the judge has withdrawn the demand evidently after much pressure from the state AG.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    U.S.A.
    Posts
    8,039
    Lady's Human:the judge has withdrawn the demand evidently after much pressure from the state AG. >>>>>>>>

    Thank Goodness! I was hoping the negative publicity of public outcry would cause
    the judge to change his mind. I am appalled that he needed outrage from
    the public in the first place. I would not want that judge on
    my case.


    ----<---<--<{(@

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Pixsburgh
    Posts
    5,004
    Quote Originally Posted by Lady's Human
    Just read a Fox news story, the judge has withdrawn the demand evidently after much pressure from the state AG.
    Oh I am so glad - what a relief!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Ploss's Halfway House for Homeless Cats
    Posts
    18,311
    Good!! I'm glad they ruled NOT to make her watch it. That stupid judge is nothing but a dirty old man in a robe on a bench, who was looking for a free "peep show". UGH!!!

    I also think they were trying to make her drop her case. Glad she stood her ground.

    The judicial system needs to stop making the VICTIMS the bad guys in rape cases and concentrate on what's important...putting disgusting criminals who commit the crimes behind bars!!

    Rest In Peace Casey (Bubba Dude) Your paw print will remain on my heart forever. 12/02
    Mollie Rose, you were there for me through good times and in bad, from the beginning.Your passing will leave a hole in my heart.We will be together "One Fine Day". 1994-2009
    MooShoo,you left me too soon.I wasn't ready.Know that you were my soulmate and have left me broken hearted.I loved you like no other. 1999 - 2010See you again "ONE FINE DAY"
    Maya Linn, my heart is broken. The day your beautiful blue eyes went blind was the worst day of my life.I only wish I could've done something.I'll miss your "premium" purr and our little "conversations". 1997-2013 See you again "ONE FINE DAY"

    DO NOT BUY WHILE SHELTER ANIMALS DIE!!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio USA
    Posts
    11,467
    A couple of things. Rape is not about sex, but, about power/conquest. So, when someone says the person deserved, or was asking to be raped, they aren't understanding the psychology of the crime. If rape was about sex, and people 'asking' to be raped by their apparel (or lack thereof), why are completely clothed people raped?

    However, I imagine we are missing a significant part of the story as it relates to the Judge's order. If the prosecutor thought introduction of the video tape was necessary for a conviction, I can't think of any other way to get it into evidence unless the victim 'authenticated' it, "yes, that is me on the tape". (The defendant can't be ordered to testify against himself..so, he won't be authenticating it).

    In rape/assualt cases, it often comes down to one person's word against another's word, and since the prosecution must prevail beyond reasonable doubt (something we often say is in the 95% range), and sometimes victim's testimony can't stand on its own, I can see how the viewing of the tape could be critical, and where the Judge might be coming from.

    I guess if it were me, and I wanted to be sure of a conviciton, I would view the tape.

Similar Threads

  1. Death Penalty For Child Rape?
    By lizbud in forum Dog House
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 04-17-2008, 10:24 PM
  2. Judge Critized For Rape Decision
    By lizbud in forum Dog House
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-12-2007, 01:01 AM
  3. Tammy Grimes Dogs deserve better faces jail
    By flip195 in forum Dog Rescue
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-12-2007, 01:53 AM
  4. Rape Victim Arrested, Then Denied Morning After Pill
    By dukedogsmom in forum Dog House
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 01-31-2007, 03:11 PM
  5. eckerds refuses morning after pill to rape victim
    By guster girl in forum Dog House
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 02-13-2004, 02:32 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Copyright © 2001-2013 Pet of the Day.com