PDA

View Full Version : Guilty!



sammy101
11-12-2004, 03:15 PM
This just in.... Scott Peterson is guilty,the murdering of his wife and baby.Im going to go look for the news report soon.

tatsxxx11
11-12-2004, 03:16 PM
1st degree for Laci
2nd degree for baby Conner.

I believe this to be just but my heart breaks for his mother. How sad for all

RedHedd
11-12-2004, 03:17 PM
Yup - we just watched/listened to the verdict.

sammy101
11-12-2004, 03:21 PM
heres a news..www.abcnews.go.com

Judge: Peterson Jury Has Reached VerdictJudge Says Scott Peterson Jury Has Reached Verdict; to Be Announced at 4 P.m. EST
Scott Peterson is shown in court in this Jan. 14, 2004 photo. (AP Photo/Bart Ah You, pool)
The Associated Press

REDWOOD CITY, Calif. Nov 12, 2004 — Jurors in the Scott Peterson murder trial reached a verdict Friday, winding up the sensational case on their second day of deliberations after having to start back at square one twice in two days.

Judge Alfred A. Delucchi told the court, filled with attorneys, the media and Peterson himself, that the verdict would be made public at 4 p.m. EST. Audio of the court proceeding was to be made available for broadcasters, but not video, the judge had ruled.

The verdict followed the back-to-back dismissals of jurors on Tuesday and Wednesday and a day off of deliberations for Veterans Day. The two dismissed jurors were replaced with alternates, and each time, the panel was told to begin deliberations anew.

The final panel had deliberated for around five hours on Wednesday and an additional three hours Friday.


Judge: Peterson Jury Has Reached Verdict
Overdose Murder Charge Dropped Against Mom
School Talent Show Draws Secret Service
Jurors were deciding whether Peterson killed his pregnant wife, Laci, who vanished Dec. 24, 2002, from their home in Modesto. He faced a second murder count in the death of the fetus, a boy the couple planned to name Conner.

The highly publicized trial began with jury selection in March and opening arguments in June. Closing arguments were presented Nov. 1 and 2 and the original panel began deliberating Nov. 3.

Prosecutors claim Peterson killed Laci, then dumped her weighted body into San Francisco Bay, because he wanted to escape marriage and fatherhood. The remains of Laci and the fetus were discovered in April a few miles from where Peterson says he went fishing alone the day his wife vanished.

The defense contended someone else killed her and said prosecutors had never proven he had any motive to kill.

Jurors were given the option of finding Peterson not guilty or convicting him or first- or second-degree murder.

First-degree convictions, carrying the death penalty or life without parole, would mean jurors concluded Peterson planned the killings. Second-degree murder convictions don't require a finding of premeditation and carry sentences of 15 years to life for each count.

On Wednesday, Delucchi dismissed the jury foreman, a man in his mid-40s who has medical and law degrees. The judge did not disclose his reasoning.

The action came a day after the removal of another juror who apparently did her own research on the case, violating the judge's order to consider only evidence presented at trial.

While deliberations went on earlier this week, the drama shifted from the courtroom to a parking lot a few blocks away. Defense attorney Mark Geragos parked a replica boat there Monday after the deliberating jurors viewed the actual boat prosecutors allege Peterson used to dump his wife's body.

But the replica boat and its contents coveralls stuffed with weights and concrete anchors tied to the arms and legs quickly became a makeshift shrine, with candles, flowers and hand-lettered signs reading "Rot in Prison" and "Justice for Laci and Conner."

Geragos had hoped to show jurors a videotaped experiment performed by the defense during which the replica boat apparently filled with water, but the judge did not allow it.



Copyright 2004 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

GraciesMommy
11-12-2004, 03:22 PM
A jury found Scott Peterson guilty of first-degree murder in the death of his wife, Laci, and of second-degree murder in the death of their unborn son today. The verdict reached by the six-man, six-woman jury leaves Peterson facing a possible sentence of death or life in prison without parole.

My Peanuts
11-12-2004, 03:24 PM
I have new found respect for this system now. Thank God this jury decided this. :D

RICHARD
11-12-2004, 03:32 PM
Hmmmmmmm.....


THAT was fast......

Now we get to listen Nancy Grace crow about the verdict.....

:o

moosmom
11-12-2004, 03:35 PM
This trial has been proof that the system really DOES work!!! Justice has been served. Halaleujiah!!

RIP Lacie and Conner.

Scott, may you rot in hell you smug SOB.

RedHedd
11-12-2004, 03:38 PM
I work in San Mateo County where the Peterson trial was held and where most of the cases I work on are venued. It will be nice to have our courthouse back to normal. It's verdicts like this that make me proud to work in the legal profession. Justice sometimes does prevail, although I know the verdict will probably be tied up in the courts on appeal for years.

moosmom
11-12-2004, 04:25 PM
As far as that boat tactic that Garagos pulled, I hope they file a grievance against him for that, and he pays a hefty fine.

And oh, where the hell WAS Garagos when the verdict was read???? That's the big question on everyone's mind now. His client was just convicted of first and second degree murder and he was nowhere to be found. How pathetic is that?????

Tonya
11-12-2004, 06:18 PM
I just went out and ran a few errands. Modesto is estatic! Everyone here is talking about it and honking their horns. People are going out to celebrate it. I didn't realize how much it has affected this small city until today. I think everyone here is relieved too.

leslie
11-13-2004, 01:00 AM
As much as I believe he is guilty, I worry about this case being used to hang/convict future cases of innocent people (women included) where we may not feel so sure. Circumstancial evidence only (the hair was positive for "mitochondrial" match- that is not 100 percent sure that it is Lacie's no matter what we think!) This is setting a precedence in trial history. If I am wrong, please correct me! (again- I "know" he did it!)