PDA

View Full Version : Conditions at breeder's home 'horrific' vet says



QueenScoopalot
08-30-2004, 09:22 PM
http://www.tennessean.com/local/archives/04/08/56235768.shtml?Element_ID=56235768

Saturday, 08/21/04 | Middle Tennessee News & Information
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FRANKLIN — Some female dogs were so old their teeth were falling out, they could barely stand and had large tumors, yet they were still being bred, a veterinarian testified yesterday at Maltese-dog breeder Jennifer Siliski's animal-cruelty trial.

One dog had undergone Caesarian-section surgery at least 10 times, veterinarian Mary Fooshee said.

Fooshee described Siliski's home-based breeding operation as ''the most horrific thing I've ever seen in my life.''

During the third day of testimony in the Williamson County Judicial Center, the focus was on how Siliski treated her dogs and whether it was fair to think of the animals in her house as pets or ''animals for sale.''

Siliski is charged with 30 counts of animal cruelty involving 12 dogs and two cats that prosecutors say suffered the most.

Authorities raided her Bowman Road home on Jan. 22, confiscating more than 230 dogs and cats. The house is just outside Franklin.

Most of the animals were being kept in steel, wire cages stacked three and four levels high, earlier witnesses had testified.

Defense attorneys tried to attack Fooshee's credibility later in the day by pointing out that she had had four jobs in a short period of time.

''Isn't there a difference in the agrarian approach to animals and raising house pets?'' defense attorney Rebecca Byrd asked veterinarian Paula A. Schuerer, a prosecution witness. ''There's a difference in treatment for pets and raising animals for sale. Some things are not required for a breeder that are for a pet owner?''

Schuerer, who owns a private animal hospital and kennel in Cool Springs where some of Siliski's dogs were treated, said there was a difference: Siliski created an environment conducive to the spread of disease and infection by not keeping the cages clean.

Schuerer said she identified 15 diseases, infections and parasites on Siliski's animals.

Fooshee, who worked for Williamson County Animal Control until two months ago, described how she said 14 animals Siliski is accused of torturing had suffered.

She said some of the dogs were so dehydrated they couldn't stand up, others suffered from infections of the ear and uterus, and a pair of newborn kittens had upper respiratory infections that caused their eyes to be crusted shut.

The vet said at least three dogs were over age 13 and were still being bred, despite blindness, dental disease and mange.

''It was the most horrific thing I've ever seen in my life, cruelty cases or otherwise,'' said Fooshee, appearing to hold back tears. ''The animals were so helpless.''

In an apparent attempt to attack Fooshee's credibility, Byrd asked her to tell the jury how many places she'd worked over the past three years.

''You've had four different jobs in the last three years,'' Byrd said. ''Why do you keep changing jobs, Dr. Fooshee?''

Fooshee said she has had disagreements with her bosses and prefers to work as a ''relief vet,'' filling in for other vets who go on vacation or need extra help.

At one point in the trial Circuit Court Judge R.E. Lee Davies excused jurors to decide whether Byrd could ask Fooshee why she had been fired from Williamson County Animal Control two months earlier.

Davies said he wanted to determine whether the questioning was relevant. Fooshee said it was for ''my inability to get along with the director and for a post I had made on the Maltese forum Web site.''

Fooshee posted a message on the Web site stating that the medical records she'd kept on Siliski's dogs had disappeared. Davies said the reason Fooshee was fired was not relevant but said he would allow Byrd to enter the Web site posting as evidence because it demonstrated that Fooshee had a bias in the case.

The trial will resume at 8:30 a.m. Tuesday.

QueenScoopalot
08-30-2004, 09:24 PM
If I'm not mistaken..this same breeder was giving her dogs viagra, and estrogen for humans to make them reproduce faster! :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:

anna_66
08-30-2004, 10:05 PM
OMG how horrible:mad: Those poor animals:(

Laura's Babies
08-31-2004, 07:55 AM
DISGUSTING! At least they got her and can put her out of business.....(The breeder)

KYS
08-31-2004, 08:54 AM
Disgusting is right!
I hope she gets a stiff sentence or she
might be caught doing this again. :(

DJFyrewolf36
08-31-2004, 12:10 PM
I fail to see how a vets credibility should determine whether or not those animlas are being cruely treated. If they are so concerned, take the animals to another vet. If they are sick and injured due to the conditions in the breeders home then that should be enough evidence to put this cretin away! Also, There SHOULDNT be a difference in how animals are treated, even if they are "just for sale" "Some things are not required for a breeder" ??? What the...? Holy crud I know if I ever were to go to a breeder to get ANY pet I would want to go to a breeder that treated the animals as if they were thier own! I would NEVER buy from a breeder that just treated animals as "products". I mean my God how retarded do you have to be to buy this line of bull fecal matter! Someone should slap the defense lawer and then slap the stupid breeder.

moosmom
09-01-2004, 01:43 PM
I've said it once and I'll say it again....that why I absolutely LOATE breeders!!! :mad: :mad:

IMO, all breeders should be licensed both through the state and federal and pay a "breeder's tax".

MooShoo came from a similar situation. His breeder's home was absolutely disgusting, with cat poo and pee all over the place, litterboxes filled to the bring with the stuff. He and his littermates are now blind because of the breeder's neglect, in that she failed to treat their herpes virus in their eyes.

:mad: :mad: