Princess accused over dog attack

[ChrisH]

Whatever else may be thought - the pros and cons of the dangerous dog act - this at least proves that the Royal Family is not above the law.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2286903.stm

[Rachel]

Thank goodness no one was seriously injured.

[CountryWolf07]

Good to know that nobody was hurt..

[FloppsyLadySally54]

Whew! At least nobody got hurt (it seems to be the popular saying on this thread lol).:)

[Tina]

Thankgoodness nobody was hurt!

[Sudilar]

Hopefully she learned her lesson and will keep the pup on a leash. At least she said she didn' want preferential treatment and will go to court. Glad no one was really hurt!

[Kfamr]

I wonder what kind of dog it was.

[ramanth]

Glad no one was seriously hurt.



Originally posted by Kfamr
I wonder what kind of dog it was.

"They have been charged under the Dangerous Dogs Act with failing to keep the bull terrier under proper control. " :)

[lovemymaltese]

That could have been so bad, thank goodness that no one was seriously hurt.

[Albea]

For somebody who grew up with dogs and had them all her life she certainly should know better than to walk a dog without a leash. Isn't the park at Windsor Castle big enough to exercise a dog that she had to go where there were other people around and put them in danger?:mad:
You may not remember this but, many years ago there was an episode in "Monty Python Flying Circus" that had to do with "Her Royal Highness the Dummy Princess Margaret." She is not around anymore but it seems to run in the family.;)

[ChrisH]

Update
Thought you may want to know what happened in the court case.

Princess Royal fined over dog attack (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2497531.stm)